DeFlock | HaveIBeenFlocked | Eyes On Flock

Current Events

Recent verified developments involving Flock Safety cameras being shut down, removed, paused, or canceled — plus the major active lawsuits now shaping how ALPR surveillance is being challenged in court.

Status:
Paused / Under Review
Appeal Pending
Active Lawsuit / Enforcement
Removed / Terminated
Past Removal Context
March 23, 2026
Troy, New York pauses Flock’s national search tool
Current event · Troy Police / Troy City Council
⏸ Paused / Contested

Troy police temporarily shut off the national search feature that lets local Flock camera data interact with the broader nationwide Flock network. According to the Times Union, the feature was paused as city officials continued gathering public feedback, and the City Council also tabled a contract renewal request amid privacy and data-sharing concerns.

What changed The cameras were not fully removed, but one of the most controversial features — cross-agency national searching — was switched off while residents and officials debated whether Troy should continue using the system.
Residents & local activists Troy Police Troy City Council
March 5, 2026
Ithaca, New York ends its Flock contract
Current event · Ithaca Common Council
✅ Contract ended

Ithaca’s Common Council voted to end the city’s contract with Flock Safety after public backlash and sustained concerns about surveillance, privacy, and data sharing. Local reporting described Ithaca as one of the latest cities to cut ties with the company.

What changed Ithaca moved from debate to termination, adding another recent example of a city deciding that the privacy and accountability concerns outweighed the system’s claimed public-safety benefits.
Residents & advocates Ithaca Common Council Flock Safety
February 25, 2026
Mountain View, California terminates its ALPR pilot
Official city action · Mountain View City Council
✅ Terminated

Mountain View’s City Council voted unanimously on February 24 to terminate the city’s contract with Flock Safety. The city said its 30 ALPR cameras had already been turned off since February 2 after an internal audit found that federal and state agencies had accessed Mountain View data in violation of approved city policies.

What changed This was not just a pause. Mountain View ended the vendor contract, kept the cameras off, and said the stationary Flock cameras would be removed as soon as possible.
Mountain View residents Mountain View City Council Mountain View Police
February 25, 2026
Coralville, Iowa removes Flock cameras after council vote
Current event · Coralville City Council
✅ Removed

Coralville removed its Flock cameras one day after the city council voted to end the contract. Local coverage tied the decision to a dispute over Iowa law after the city had originally approved the cameras with a policy that they would not be used to help enforce immigration law.

What changed Coralville moved quickly from council action to physical removal, making it one of the clearest recent examples of a city reversing course.
City council review Coralville Police Flock Safety
February 19, 2026
Flagstaff, Arizona confirms all city Flock cameras were removed
Official city action · City of Flagstaff
✅ Physically removed

Flagstaff announced it had received confirmation that all Flock Safety cameras covered by the city’s contract had been physically removed. The city said the council had voted in December 2025 to terminate the contract and that the cameras were immediately turned off and stopped collecting data after that vote.

What changed Flagstaff went beyond deactivation: the city confirmed the hardware itself was gone.
Flagstaff City Council City of Flagstaff Flock Safety
January 9, 2026
Staunton, Virginia says Flock contract is officially terminated
Official city action · City of Staunton
✅ Contract terminated

Staunton announced that its Flock contract was officially terminated as of January 8, 2026. The city said police had initiated the termination process in December 2025 and that, at the time of the announcement, Flock had not yet scheduled removal of the readers.

What changed Staunton formally severed the vendor relationship, even though hardware removal had not yet been scheduled when the city posted its notice.
Staunton city officials Staunton Police Department Flock Safety
January 21, 2026 update · filed October 3, 2025
California v. City of El Cajon
San Diego County Superior Court
⚖ Active enforcement case

California Attorney General Rob Bonta sued El Cajon over allegations that the city illegally shared ALPR data with federal and out-of-state agencies in violation of state law. In January 2026, Bonta said he had filed a motion continuing the case, and that El Cajon had shared ALPR data with over 100 out-of-state law enforcement agencies.

What changed This remains one of the most important live cases around ALPR data-sharing limits. California is seeking a court order forcing El Cajon to stop the sharing and comply with SB 34.
California Attorney General City of El Cajon El Cajon Police Department
February 26–27, 2026
California drivers sue Flock Safety in class action
San Francisco Superior Court
⚖ Active class action

A new class action filed by Gibbs Mura and co-counsel alleges that Flock Safety unlawfully shared millions of Californians’ movements with out-of-state and federal law-enforcement agencies. KTVU reported that the suit says out-of-state agencies searched the San Francisco database more than 1.6 million times in seven months.

What changed Unlike the El Cajon case, which targets a city, this lawsuit directly targets Flock Safety and challenges the company’s alleged role in enabling unlawful sharing itself.
California drivers (putative class) Flock Safety Gibbs Mura / co-counsel
January 27, 2026
Schmidt v. City of Norfolk
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
⚖ Appeal pending

In one of the highest-profile constitutional challenges to Flock cameras, a federal judge ruled for Norfolk and against the plaintiffs who argued the city’s Flock system amounted to warrantless dragnet surveillance. Reporting on the decision noted that the plaintiffs planned to appeal after the court held the system was not yet capable of tracking the whole of a person’s movements.

What changed The district-court ruling was a setback for privacy plaintiffs, but the case remains important because it is moving into the appellate stage and could shape future Fourth Amendment challenges to Flock systems.
Institute for Justice Schmidt plaintiffs City of Norfolk

Stay Informed. Stay Protected.

Join our mailing list for updates on Flock camera removals, local fights over new installations, and the lawsuits shaping the future of ALPR surveillance.

✉ Subscribe via Email

Your email goes directly to us — no third-party services involved.